Both professional genealogists and casual family researchers need genealogy standards in order to get their genealogy right. Without standards, inaccuracies and myths can be created and perpetuated. Many of these errors can be avoided by working to genealogy standards.
Genealogy standards have evolved over many years. Family historians originally tapped into the legal field and applied its preponderance of evidence principle to their work. Subsequently, genealogists recognized this approach was not the best fit for family history as an accumulation of evidence is not always sufficient for proof. From 1997 to 2000, BCG analyzed, defined, and combined the best genealogy practices and created the Genealogical Proof Standard. In 2000, BCG published The BCG Genealogical Standards Manual. After further refinement, BCG published Genealogy Standards in 2014.
For a deeper understanding of the refinements from 2000 to 2014, see Genealogy Standards Comparison Chart: New versus Old Standards and Genealogy Standards Comparison Chart: Old versus New Standards.
Following these standards helps family historians research thoroughly, document properly, analyze, and correlate evidence, resolve conflicts, and write clear and convincing genealogical works.
What Are Standards?
Standards are the best practices for genealogy. They enable all genealogists—not just BCG associates—to come as close as possible to what actually happened in history.
Genealogical Proof Standard (GPS)
To reach a sound conclusion, we need to meet all five components of the GPS.
1. Reasonably exhaustive research.
2. Complete and accurate source citations.
3. Thorough analysis and correlation.
4. Resolution of conflicting evidence.
5. Soundly written conclusion based on the strongest evidence.
The GPS overarches all of the documentation, research, and writing standards described in Genealogy Standards, and is applied across the board in all genealogical research to measure the credibility of conclusions about ancestral identities, relationships, and life events.
Leary, Helen F. M. “Evidence Revisited—DNA, POE and GPS.” OnBoard 4 (January 1998): 1–2, 5.
Note: some dated terminology, but an important explanation why genealogists no longer use a “preponderance of the evidence” standard.
Jones, Thomas W. “New Standards or Old? Guidelines for Effective Research and Family Histories.” Board for Certification of Genealogists, sponsor. Legacy Family Tree Webinars. https://familytreewebinars.com/download.php?webinar_id=610
Sayre, Pamela Boyer. “Enough is Enough, Or Is It?” Board for Certification of Genealogists, sponsor. Legacy Family Tree Webinars. https://familytreewebinars.com/download.php?webinar_id=499
The GPS is illustrated in many articles published in the scholarly journals such as the:
– National Genealogical Society Quarterly (NGSQ),
– New York Genealogical & Biographical Record,
– New England Historical and Genealogical Register,
– The American Genealogist, and
– The Genealogist.
MORE ABOUT GENEALOGY STANDARDS
Links to Related Genealogical Organizations: Ethics and Standards
BCG does not endorse the code of ethics or the standards of the following related genealogical organizations. The links to the codes and standards of these organizations are provided as a courtesy.
BCG partners with Legacy Family Tree to produce instructional hour-long webinars by BCG associates. The webinars are free when first presented each month and for a limited time afterwards. Access the BCG Webinar Library at http://legacy.familytreewebinars.com/?tid=2619. Note: BCG receives a commission if a person registers for or buys a webinar using the affiliate link.